11.06.2009

Changing Tax Regimes Could Shift the Balance of Power in European Football

It is generally tough to empathize with people who make tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars per week while being adored by millions to play a sport. This is especially true while the world is in the midst of a global economic crisis and on a day where headlines scream about 10% unemployment in the US.


However, despite it all, footballers are still people. Many of them have the same problems as everyone else, such as mortgage bills, car payments, bar tabs and dinner bills in the thousands of dollars, demanding model and pop star girlfriends… Well, maybe not the exact same troubles, but it is nonetheless conceptually easy for even the average Joe to grasp the following point; some professional athletes, including soccer players, make career decisions based more on potential paychecks than opportunities for trophies.

Based on this shocking fact, and due to some upcoming changes in the tax regimes of the host nations of what are arguably the top leagues in the world, the balance of power between the most successful leagues in Europe may soon shift. Even for those not facing the perils of the top-earners tax bracket, it is not difficult to imagine what could happen to a salary getting a 43% to 50% haircut before the direct deposit to checking occurs. And that is exactly what is going to happen to foreign players in Spain and England, respectively, starting next year.

England already taxes top earners at 40%, but its scheduled change to a 50% rate is nonetheless fairly dramatic. An even more dramatic change is scheduled in Spain, where due to the so-called Beckham Law passed in 2004, foreigners in the top bracket are only taxed at a 24% rate currently. This law was passed to attract high earners in all fields to the country. However, the top rate of 24% rate is scheduled to increase to 43% early next year. Though the Spanish law will not work retroactively, it is not difficult to imagine that a year that has seen players the caliber of Alonso, Ibrahimovic, Kaka, Ronaldo, Benzema agitate for moves to Spanish clubs would be less likely in the future under a less competitive wage scheme. Many recent articles have focused on the claims of the Spanish Primera that it will strike if this potential change occurs as scheduled. However there has been less analysis on the good result which could come of it.

This good result is namely the potential for greater parity between leagues. As can be seen in American sports leagues such as the NFL, the NBA and some extent Major League Baseball, some degree of parity can be good. It creates the potential for more clubs and fan bases to go through their seasons believing that they have a chance at the ultimate prize, and can ultimately lead to more teams with championship trophies over time. With the dominance of English and Spanish teams in the cross-border Champions League the past few years, it may be refreshing to see clubs from other nations, such as Germany or Italy, or even Portugal or Holland, return to the podium. And this may be possible if there is less incentive for top players to immediately go to Madrid, Manchester, Barcelona or London as soon as one of the big clubs come knocking.

Therefore, despite the excesses of athletes which so many find appalling, particularly in tough economic times, this may be a case where greed, for lack of a better term, is good. If players think twice about going to England or Spain due to their tax regimes, greater parity may be the result throughout Europe, with the end result being a more interesting, and more competitive continental structure.

4 comments:

  1. Anonymous6/11/09 21:43

    Interesting take on this subject. I would be curious to find out if FIFA has anything to do with upping the taxes in England/Spain to make other leagues around the world more attractive to top tier talent.

    I'm sure there are people around the world would like a little variety from year-to-year when it comes to the Champions League finale, (so that the regulars aren't always in the final four). I can remember a few seasons back when three of the four teams from the English Premier League were in the final four, maybe it was all four. Personally, I didn't have a problem with it. But I can see where others might.

    I don't think people could really fault the players for chasing all those dollar signs. If I were blessed with a God given talent to do something at the level of these athletes, I would be stupid not to. People here in America tend to hate the New York Yankees for "buying" championships, but they are playing within the rules of the game (I am by nooooo means a Yankees fan, far from it). Yes, the Yankees "brand" is more well know than say the Colorado Rockies (who?), but is that the Yankees fault? Simple answer, no. They do a much better job of marketing their brand than most of the other Major League Baseball teams, and thus generate more capital to which they can spend within the rules MLB has set forth. Can the same not be said for Manu, Chelska, Real, or any of the other top tier squad in soccer? The Yankees have the YES Network, Mets have SNY, Sox have NESN (although I'm not sure if the Sox own it). Well I'm pretty sure Manu has their own cable network, and I'm sure that many of the other top tier squads do too.

    Could it be as simple as who has the most money to spend is going to win? Not necessarily. One pretty much has to be a multi-billionaire to own a pro sports team here in America. Many of the owners here treat their sports franchise purely as a business venture. You can't tell me with all honesty that a team like the K.C. Royals truly wants to win the championship year in and year out. I would have to call shenanigans on that one. They do well in developing young talent, and then when that talent has come close to the end of their contracts the management teams sells them off for draft choices or other compensation instead of signing that talent up for an astronomical contract (case and point: Carlos Beltran). Then the Yankees (or other FatCat team) comes along and scoops them up. That's just sport. Happens here, happens everywhere, regardless of whether you're talking MLB, NFL, EPL, La Liga, etc, etc, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great points....

    I would point out that FIFA does not have any control over the tax regimes of any country. They are purely political decisions made by each nation. Think about it this way, the professional sports leagues in the US (or FIFA for that matter), powerful though they may be, have no control over federal or state taxes.

    I would also point out that I do not begrudge anyone the ability to chase dollars, nor do I fault teams for leveraging their dollar or branding assets. I do think, however, that if the side-effect of governments playing around with taxes is better, more competitive football, that can't be a bad thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This tax issue is already having repurcussions for the reigning champions in Spain. See the end of the article for some thoughts on why a potential Robinho deal to Barcelona may not have a chance.

    http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=696974&sec=transfers&cc=5901

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here is another interesting article on this topic. Notably, this one is from before Xabi Alonso's move from England to Spain. One wonders if he still would have made the move in light of upcoming changes...

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/liverpool/5578084/Xabi-Alonso-warns-that-tax-will-drive-top-players-away.html

    ReplyDelete